CPCInsider

Strategy

What is market research? Start with a five-interview decision worksheet

Plan five focused customer interviews around one business decision. Includes neutral prompts, an evidence table and clear limits on small-sample conclusions.

Vladlens Kecko · · 6 min read

Editorial illustration: Ask about reality. Keep the limits.

Market research is the work of gathering and assessing evidence about customers and the market to inform a decision. It can include existing data and direct research. A customer interview is one method, not a substitute for measuring market size or estimating search demand.

If the team is debating an offer without understanding how buyers choose, a small interview round can identify questions worth testing. GOV.UK's in-depth interview guidance recommends exploring real examples with open, neutral questions. Our worksheet applies that approach to one commercial decision; five interviews are a manageable starting project, not a universal sufficient sample.

1. Write the decision before the discussion guide

For a fictional commercial-cleaning provider, the decision might be: should its proposal explain the supervision and handoff process more clearly before the team changes the price? The research question is what buyers needed to trust the service during their most recent selection.

Do not start with “Do customers like our new package?” That invites a reaction to your idea rather than evidence about the buying process. Choose the customer group with the segmentation worksheet and record what evidence could change your current view.

2. Create a recruitment matrix

Plan to speak with people who have relevant recent experience. A possible five-person round could include two recent buyers, two prospects who chose another route and one person who postponed the decision. Those numbers are a proposed learning mix, not a representative sample.

Record role, buying situation, approximate decision timing and why the experience is relevant. Include a note about who is missing. Five enthusiastic existing customers alone may tell you little about the reasons suitable prospects did not buy.

Ask for permission to take notes or record, explain the purpose and keep identifiable records access-controlled. Participation does not imply permission to publish a quote or use the conversation as a testimonial.

3. Use a short guide that follows the last real decision

PromptWhat to look for
What first made you look for a provider?Trigger and situation
What did you do next?Actual sequence and alternatives
What information was difficult to obtain?An evidence or process gap
Who else had to agree?Decision roles and approvals
What happened after you chose or postponed?Outcome and unresolved work

Use follow-up questions to clarify a specific incident. Do not turn “What was missing?” into “Would our new dashboard solve that?” Keep a separate space for your interpretation so it does not become part of the participant's account.

4. Build an evidence table, not a persuasive story

After each conversation, write the participant code, observed issue, supporting example, uncertainty and possible implication. Record contradictory accounts rather than removing them to simplify the presentation.

In a fictional summary, three of five participants could describe uncertainty about who supervised cleaning, one could emphasise access arrangements and one could focus on price. This means three people in this particular round mentioned supervision. It does not establish that 60% of the market prioritises it or that a new supervision message will increase sales.

ObservationInterpretation to checkNext evidence
Three accounts mention an unclear supervisorThe handoff explanation may be incompleteInspect proposals and service process
One buyer chose mainly on priceDifferent purchasing criteria may existCheck context and segment differences
One postponed the decisionNon-purchase may be an alternativeInvestigate timing and internal approval

5. Choose one reversible next step

If the process really includes a supervisor, draft a clearer explanation for review by the delivery owner. If no such process exists, a marketing claim cannot fix the operational gap. Use the positioning statement worksheet to check claims against facts.

Define what you will observe next: whether suitable readers understand the handoff, whether clarification questions change and what subsequent proposals record. Keep audience, dates and other changes visible. Comprehension or enquiry counts alone do not establish causal sales lift.

Your output: a decision memo

Summarise the decision, recruitment gaps, evidence, contradictions and one next test. For public competitor evidence, use the separate competitor-analysis worksheet. Request a free 30-minute founder-led growth review for a short written three-priority plan with no obligation to hire CPCInsider.

About the author

Vladlens Kecko

Free founder-led growth review

Know where to focus your next marketing investment.

In a focused 30-minute conversation, we review your advertising, website and sales follow-up together. Afterwards, you receive a short written action plan you can use with your own team or with ours.

Get my free growth review
01

Your biggest growth gaps

See where your ads, website or follow-up may be losing potential customers.

02

Your next 3 priorities

Get a ranked action list with the reason for each recommendation and what to check next.

03

A practical starting plan

Leave with clear next steps for your team, plus our recommendation if you want help implementing them.

Continue reading

Related services and proof

Business GrowthStrategy4,002 Meta leads and €818,984 in CRM won deals